What Was The Outcome Of The Stanford Prison Experiment? Conclusion. According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment revealed how people will readily conform to the social roles they are expected to play, especially if the roles are as strongly stereotyped as those of the prison guards.
Was the Stanford prison experiment a failure? The Stanford Prison Experiment — the infamous 1971 exercise in which regular college students placed in a mock prison suddenly transformed into aggressive guards and hysterical prisoners — was deeply flawed, a new investigation reveals.
What was the goal of the Stanford Prison Experiment? Q: What was the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment
What was the main takeaway of the Stanford Prison Experiment? Zimbardo’s conclusion was that we are not so much inherently “evil,” but that we will commit heinous acts if encouraged to do so by systems that enable or encourage them. He took his results to the U.S. House of Representatives shortly after the experiment ended, testifying before a subcommittee on prison reform.
What Was The Outcome Of The Stanford Prison Experiment? – Related Questions
Did anyone die in the Stanford Prison Experiment?
No, no one died in the Stanford Prison Experiment. The experiment became abusive and immoral within a few days as guards became increasingly
Who was Prisoner 8612?
Douglas Korpi
One of the prisoners (#8612), Douglas Korpi, a 22-year-old Berkeley graduate, began to exhibit uncontrollable crying and rage 36 hours into the experiment, described by Zimbardo as “acute emotional disturbance”.
Could the Stanford prison experiment be conducted today?
The Stanford Prison Experiment would not be allowed to be conducted today due to the various violations of ethics including depriving participants of the right to withdraw, informed consent, debriefing and the protection from physical and psychological harm.
Why was the Stanford experiment unethical?
As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would escalate to the point of abuse that it did. It’s hard to perceive the whole process,” Zimbardo said.
What did the Milgram study teach us about obedience?
Milgram found that participants obeyed the experimenter at an unexpectedly high rate: 65% of the participants gave the learner the 450-volt shock.
What did Zimbardo say to prisoner 8612 when he asked to leave?
He began telling other inmates, “You can’t leave. You can’t quit,” because of Zimbardo’s decision to send him back inside. He began thinking that his circumstances were real and no longer an experiment.
Who conducted the Stanford Prison Experiment?
professor Philip G.
Zimbardo
Carried out August 15-21, 1971 in the basement of Jordan Hall, the Stanford Prison Experiment set out to examine the psychological effects of authority and powerlessness in a prison environment.
The study, led by psychology professor Philip G.
Zimbardo, recruited Stanford students using a local newspaper ad.
Was the Stanford Prison Experiment qualitative or quantitative?
The Stanford prison experiment which was conducted by Haney, Banks and most famously Zimbardo, used both qualitative and quantitative data. The majority being qualitative. This was done through various methods such as video, direct observation and later interviews.
What was unethical about the Milgram experiment?
What did we learn from Milgram experiment?
The Milgram experiment, and the replications and related experiments that followed it, showed that contrary to expectations, most people will obey an order given by an authority figure to harm someone, even if they feel that it’s wrong, and even if they want to stop.
What can we learn from the Milgram experiment?
The Milgram experiment was carried out many times whereby Milgram (1965) varied the basic procedure (changed the IV). By doing this Milgram could identify which factors affected obedience (the DV). Obedience was measured by how many participants shocked to the maximum 450 volts (65% in the original study).
Why do we obey?
In everyday situations, people obey orders because they want to get rewards, because they want to avoid the negative consequences of disobeying, and because they believe an authority is legitimate. People justify their behavior by assigning responsibility to the authority rather than themselves.
What was the concern with prisoner 8612?
Less than 36 hours into the experiment, Prisoner #8612 began suffering from acute emotional disturbance, disorganized thinking, uncontrollable crying, and rage.
What research method did Zimbardo use?
He used a number of qualitative approaches such as observation (sometimes overt and sometimes covert) interviews and questionnaires. Zimbardo’s study was clearly trying to give a situational explanation for behaviour. He argued that the study demonstrates the powerful effect roles can have on peoples’ behaviour.
What qualitative methods?
What are some qualitative research methods
What are qualitative data?
Qualitative data describes qualities or characteristics.
It is collected using questionnaires, interviews, or observation, and frequently appears in narrative form.
For example, it could be notes taken during a focus group on the quality of the food at Cafe Mac, or responses from an open-ended questionnaire.
Do the benefits of Zimbardo’s research outweigh the costs?
Though all of the participants gave full informed consent and the right to withdraw (yet there was a monetary incentive) Salvin argued the benefits the study provided, did not outweigh the costs- regardless of whether the effect on the participants eventually wore off.
